You can protect your hardware and software with service contracts and insurance policies, but the only way to protect your data from catastrophe is by backing it up. When you consider tape backup solutions, you have a plethora of choices. However, sifting through them can be difficult and time-consuming.

In the past few years, vendors have increased the number of hard disks they install in workstations and servers. In the Windows NT Magazine Lab, we've seen workstations with five 9GB hard disks installed in a RAID configuration and servers with four times as many hard disks. Many tape manufacturers produce 8GB uncompressed tape drives; obviously, you need many of these tape drives to back up such large systems.

Windows NT server and workstation storage capacities continue to increase exponentially every year, so tape devices that can store more data on individual tapes are more important than ever before. Whether you work for a small to midsized company or a departmental workgroup within a large enterprise, you need to look at midrange tape backup solutions. If you back up between 20GB and 500GB of data regularly, you need a flexible, reliable, and scalable solution that fits your budget. If your primary need is blazing backup speed, and money is no object, you might consider a high-end system. Vendors optimize tape solutions in this category for high transfer rates, high access speed, and compatibility with robotic equipment. Typical transfer rates are several megabytes per second, and pricing for these drives starts at approximately $5000.

Looking for Mr. GoodTape
Factors to consider when you purchase a tape backup unit include the amount of data you need to back up, whether your backup software supports the unit, and the amount of money you want to spend. You also need to consider the value of your data: Put a price tag on your data and on the time you'd need to rebuild the data if you lost it. Be willing to spend as much money on a tape unit as you calculate your data to be worth.

Some units in the buyer's guide support multiple tape formats, and others support only one format. You need to determine the maximum backup window you have and choose a unit that provides the technology you need to back up and restore data within that time period. For example, some products use optical disk, which is a great solution for Hierarchical Storage Management (HSM) but a terrible one for backing up large amounts of data quickly.

If you plan to use a certain software backup product, you need to research the tape backup units the product supports.

Tape devices are known for their long-lasting performance between hardware failures, which is partly attributable to the reliable tape drives and robotics that most systems include. Despite this reliability, you should research a vendor's service contract to ensure that the contract includes same-day on-site or overnight cross-shipping service if the unit fails.

Fierce competition in the tape backup arena has created an abundance of performance claims. You need to determine the type of files the vendor used to test the drive and the type of test the vendor ran because many claims are a result of using totally compressed files. These tests don't take into account that many file types can't be compressed, so the tests don't simulate real-world scenarios. For a list of future buyer's guide topics or to learn how to include your product in an upcoming buyer's guide, go to http://www.winntmag.com/ sh/ntlab/index.cfm.

End of Article




You must log on before posting a comment.

If you don't have a username & password, please register now.

Reader Comments

THIS ARTICLE MADE NO PRODUCT SUGGESTIONS!! -- I NEED TO FIND THE MOST SUITABLE TAPE BACKUP FOR A WIN NT WKSTATION 4.0 DATA FILES FULL BACKUP

EILEEN W.

This article was weak! It gave only general information with no testing and no recommendations. The buyers guide was just as noncommittal. Did you guys promise your advertisers you wouldn't play favorites?

Masen Yaffee

Come on guys. Let's have some content please.

Gaston

I'm look for a solution to support large capacity (over 20GB to 50GB) and faster performance but fail to found at this article.

Samson Ling

I was coaxed into investing in an Exabyte430M (mammoth 2) tape library which promised backups at dazzling speeds (average throughput 800MB / sec). However, I found out the hard way that although the drive promised astounding tape backup speed and throughput, when it was installed in my Fast Ethernet network environment, after a year or so, the drive started to fail frequently. I would have to replace media frequently as well. I later found out, after making several calls to the support department and being pushed around from one dept to another, that that particular model was not designed to keep up with a slow network. The drives couldn't keep up with a slower data transfer rate from the host and therefore the drives were subject to frequent "backhitching" and therefore the wear and tear was greater on both the drive heads as well as the media. Exabyte later came out with a superior product with a buffer that could keep up with slower data transfer rates to avoid backhitching but of course, the damage was done and I didn't have the budget to replace the library. The strange thing is ours was a standard 100Mbps switched network. Therefore to fix the problem I upgraded to a Gbit Ethernet switch and also upgraded my backup server to include a Gbit Ethernet NIC. I connected all my servers being backed up to the Gbit Ethernet switch and also upgraded each of their Nics to Gbit Ethernet. However, on some of the servers I still get throughput as little as 100 MB/sec. Shouldn't the switch to Gbit Ethernet have fixed the problem with slow data transfer speeds ? I have read about backup servers with fiber NIC's. Would this help my problem ? What about the specs of the backup server itself ? Does that affect throughput in any way ? My backup server has a 1 Ghz Pentium 4 processor with 1 GB of RAM.

Rakhi

This article was trash!

Anonymous User

What was the point of this article...?

Anonymous User

Article Rating 1 out of 5

Wow talk about crap

Anonymous User

Article Rating 1 out of 5

There isn't a rating low enough for this article.

Anonymous User

Article Rating 1 out of 5

 
 

ADS BY GOOGLE