Rapid advancements in PC processor technology have resulted in a marketplace full of CPUs, each with a feature set different from the next. In this column, I provide a quick comparison of today's Top 10 x86-compatible processors.

10. Klamath Pentium II. Running at 233MHz to 300MHz, the Klamath has 32KB of Level 1 cache, 512KB of half-speed Level 2 cache, and a 0.35-micron circuit size. The Pentium II was the first Intel processor to use the Slot 1 bus connector instead of the traditional Socket 7 CPU mounting.

9. Deschutes Pentium II. Thanks to its 0.25-micron circuit size, the Deschutes supports speeds of 333MHz to 450MHz. The Deschutes has 32KB of Level 1 cache and 512KB of half-speed onboard Level 2 cache. The chip uses Slot 1 technology and supports 100MHz system bus speed.

8. K6-3D AMD-K6-2. AMD's low-cost K6-2 chip supports speeds of 350MHz to 450MHz. Built from a 0.25-micron device size, the K6-2 has 64KB of Level 1 cache and supports 1MB of Level 2 cache on the motherboard and 100MHz system bus speed. The processor uses a version of the Socket 7 technology called Super7.

7. Covington Celeron. Intel's answer to Cyrix's and AMD's low-cost chips, this Celeron is based on a Deschutes Pentium II core with the Level 2 cache removed. The chip runs at 266MHz to 300MHz. Like the Deschutes, the Covington Celeron has a 0.25-micron circuit size and 32KB of Level 1 cache, and uses Slot 1 technology.

6. Mendocino Celeron-A. The missing Level 2 cache made the original Celeron processor a performance dog, so Intel quickly replaced it with the newer 300MHz-to-500MHz Mendocino. The Mendocino processor has a 0.25-micron circuit size, 32KB of Level 1 cache, and 128KB of full-speed onboard Level 2 cache. The earlier versions used Slot 1, but later versions switched to the less-expensive Socket 370 motherboard.

5. Sharptooth AMD-K6-III. The K6-III, which AMD built to compete with the Pentium III processor, runs at 350MHz to 450MHz. The Sharptooth has a 0.25-micron circuit size, 64KB of Level 1 cache, and 256KB of full-speed onboard Level 2 cache. The processor can also utilize up to 2MB of Level 3 cache on the motherboard. Like the K6-2, the Sharptooth supports 100MHz system bus speed and uses Super7 motherboards.

4. Katmai Pentium III. The Pentium III processor runs at 450MHz to 600MHz. The processor has a 0.25-micron circuit size, 32KB of Level 1 cache, and 512KB of half-speed onboard Level 2 cache. The Pentium III processor provides 100MHz system bus speed and uses a Slot 1 motherboard.

3. Pentium III Xeon. Intel's high-end chip supports speeds of 450MHz to 500MHz. The Xeon provides 32KB of Level 1 cache, 2MB of full-speed Level 2 cache, and 133MHz system bus speed. The processor's new Slot 2 design allows multiprocessor support.

2. K7 AMD Athlon. For a while, the new AMD Athlon was the reigning speed champ at 700MHz. One vendor is even selling a 1GHz overclocked version of this chip. The standard Athlon runs at 500MHz to 700MHz. The processor has a 0.25-micron circuit size, 128KB of Level 1 cache, and 512KB of half-speed Level 2 cache. The Athlon is a Slot A processor (DEC Ev6 bus protocol) with 200MHz bus speed.

1. Coppermine Pentium III and Xeon. The 733MHz version of the Pentium III is the current 32-bit speed champ. The processor has a 0.18-micron circuit size and runs at 500MHz to 733MHz. Like the earlier Pentium III processor, the new processor has 32KB of Level 1 cache and 512KB of onboard Level 2 cache. The Xeon models support a 256KB Advanced Transfer cache with 133MHz system bus speed.

End of Article




You must log on before posting a comment.

If you don't have a username & password, please register now.

Reader Comments

Slightly biased towards Intel chips when it is obvious that AMD is producing a superior product. I am currently running four PC's with AMD 500MHz processors and they smoke the two Intel 600's we have... I'll never by Intel again.

Marco Prosdocimo

This article is just parroting what is been published on AMD and Intel's web sites. These really just happen to be the last 10 processors produced by AMD and Intel to that point in time. The question begs: why are these the top 10 processors? These are all good processors but why is one processor better for a specific application than another? The story would have been much better had the author discussed the relative merits of each processor.

Tom Turner

what a load of rubbish! Very poor. John

Anonymous User

nice spelling marco. i think that intel are better than amd based on past experince. my old amd fried itself when i tried to overclock it

Anonymous User

Article Rating 3 out of 5

i think that this article rates motherboards well but fails to metion enough details about them.

Anonymous User

what the hell are you talking about. Very stupid article

Anonymous User

thanks alot for your help i now have a computer that runs so well all my friends now ohh and ahh at it thanks again mike

Anonymous User

Article Rating 5 out of 5

 
 

ADS BY GOOGLE