• subscribe
May 24, 2007 12:00 AM

Comparing BitLocker with EFS

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #95603

Q: How does Windows Vista’s BitLocker Drive Encryption compare with Windows XP’s Encrypting File System (EFS) for protecting data on a laptop?

A: I was a long-time EFS user, but I recently stopped using it in favor of BitLocker. EFS works on a file-by-file basis, whereas BitLocker encrypts the entire volume and eliminates many of the laptop vulnerabilities that let information leak out of encrypted folders and into unencrypted folders. EFS is also vulnerable to sophisticated attacks that insert malicious code into the startup files in the Windows OS and wait for the user to enter a password and access encrypted files. A laptop equipped with the Trusted Platform Module and BitLocker can mitigate this risk.

BitLocker also supports storing the encryption key on a USB flash drive for added security. You can even use certain USB flash drives that support biometric authentication, such as those from MXI Security, to require two-factor user authentication before allowing access to encrypted drives. Note that only Vista Ultimate and Vista Enterprise support BitLocker.



ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
    There are no comments to display. Be the first one!
You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here
  • SP1?
    I know there is a SP1 for SQL 2008 R2 available....and there is a "feature pack" as well... ...
  • SQL database mirroring
    I have SQL Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64bit on Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise 64bit.  Each SQL Server has...
  • Dell Compellent Disk Drive
    Does anybody has experience with Dell Compellent Disk Drive? Basically, this system manages all disk...
  • Sql server performance tuning
    I need to find a tool that help me to optimize sql server,queries,improve the performance and solve ...