January 30, 2006 01:30 PM

SFU in R2

It’s OK to be heterogeneous
Rating: (0)
Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #48955
My husband gave me a new edition of Tracy Kidder's 1981 book, The Soul of a New Machine, for Christmas. When I first read it in the mid-80s, it helped me understand technology and the computing industry. The book is still a great read. One thing Kidder discusses is how IBM's failure to recognize market needs, demonstrated by its early decision to initially ignore the potential of minicomputers, provided opportunities for companies such as Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) and Data General to take the industry in new directions.

I was ...

...This article is for paid Professional Members only.

Already a Professional Member? Please log in now:

NOT A PROFESSIONAL MEMBER? YOU CHOOSE:

Professional Membership

Monthly

Annual

VIP Membership

Monthly

Annual

Add a Comment

I would really welcome more detail on the differences beween SFU 3.5 and the SUA shipping with R2. Can you/should you install SFU 3.5 on R2? Are there advantages to the older SFU 3.5, that might discourage a move to R2? (how) Can you move components from SFU to SUA, if indeed " Microsoft didn't add a lot of SFU features in R2"?
Is there likely to be a proper article on the ins and outs of SFU/SUA? For the half a million who downloaded SFU? ;-)

Stephen6/28/2006 3:50:11 PM


You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here
GOOGLE LINKS
SPONSORED LINKS
FEATURED LINKS