• subscribe
January 27, 2004 12:00 AM

MCSEs Speak Out

Has Microsoft abandoned them?
Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #41392

In "The Soul of Windows Revisited," September 2003, http://www.winnetmag.com, InstantDoc ID 39749, I describe Microsoft's attempts to reach out to the Windows IT community. First, I discuss Microsoft's new advertising that speaks to both IT and business professionals. Second, I describe Microsoft's efforts to establish an IT professional organization that would foster Windows community development through in-person events at the regional level. I applaud Microsoft's efforts on both accounts.

As a result of that column, I received a flood of email messages from MCSEs who complained that Microsoft has abandoned them as a group. From 1997 to 2000, the technology and Windows NT markets expanded rapidly. Any person with a reasonable technical background could get an MCSE certification and demand a $14,000 annual salary increase (on average). The MCSE gold rush was rampant, and the payoff was almost immediate. But shortly after the tech bubble burst in 2001, many MCSEs found themselves out of work and others took salary cuts to stay employed. Such is life.

However, if higher salaries are no longer the reward for getting an MCSE certification, then what's the incentive? Many MCSEs told me that they want Microsoft to recognize their efforts in getting their certifications and keeping them current. Specifically, these MCSEs would like to receive a TechNet subscription, which includes a monthly CD-ROM and access to subscriber-only resources on the TechNet Web site. In addition, they would like to receive discounts on support calls to Microsoft. Currently, Microsoft provides many of these benefits to Microsoft Most Valuable Professionals (MVPs), individuals who have been recognized for making substantial contributions to the Microsoft-related product communities. Microsoft recently recognized me as the first MVP in the storage-related product area, and I can verify that Microsoft rewards MVPs with some of these items.

Several of my friends have spent a lot of time and money earning their MCSE certifications. They believe—and I agree—that they're making a solid contribution to the Windows IT community by staying current on their certifications. They say that a TechNet subscription would be a great asset in their ongoing training and certification efforts. The annual cost of a single-user TechNet Plus subscription, which includes beta software and membership in a private TechNet newsgroup, is $529. I realize that the TechNet group isn't running a charity, but I think investing in MCSEs who have invested in Microsoft is a fair trade. I'm advocating that Microsoft provide TechNet subscriptions only to individuals who have current MCSE certifications, not to people who have let their certifications fall behind.

By the time you read this article, I hope the tech market will be completely out of its slump and that companies will have started to hire MCSEs again in earnest. But even if the industry is still lagging, I believe we need to again encourage investment in the Windows IT community. I want to be able to wholeheartedly recommend the Windows IT community as a great place to build an IT career and to say that Microsoft will reward the investment of time and money.



ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Aug 11, 2005

    At least we haven't seen any counterfeit cert.

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Aug 11, 2005

    I'm a paper MCSE and loved to be one. Why? so you experienced MCSEs can stand out of the crowd. I'm not here to make your life less profitable, I just want to have a piece of the golden pie. How about this, y'all rich MCSEs, each of you give me a dollar and I'll drop my paper cert. See, you'll have one less paper MCSE to deal with.

  • GREGORY
    8 years ago
    Jul 14, 2004

    I agree, paper MCSE's have ruined the market. I remember taking about a year and a half to complete my MCSE NT4 and working with the product in a production environment for over a year prior. Only because I didn't feel I had the experience at that time to call myself an MCSE. I could have very easily just studied books and taken practice tests, but I wanted to have real-world knowledge before I could say that I was an MCSE. I followed the same pattern when obtaining my MCSE 2000. I will also do the same for 2003. My company doesn't currently use it, so there is no reason for me to even get it.
    I also think Microsoft is to blame. They are the ones lowering their standards on the tests. Microsoft needs to redo their testing and set high limits on passing their exams. Make it harder to get. That way it will be more rewarding. My personal opinion would be to pass people with 80% or better on an exam. Can you really call yourself an MCSE by getting below 70% on every exam...

  • TOM
    8 years ago
    Jul 14, 2004

    I found TechNet useless and canceled my sub years ago. One thing I'd value would be free copies of not-for-resale software that I'm curently certified on as it is released. Some study materials would be good also. It would be cost=effective marketing ontheir part and good for the MCSE's. As a member of Network Professionals Assoc I've received (from MS) free copies of Win2K3 Server, Exchange 2K3 and Office 2K3 so it isn't an idea they haven't thought of.
    BTW IN the five years I've been certified I grown tired of the grousing that MS only has certs, testing, etc. for the revenue. It's a trivial amount for a zillion dollar company. Likewise the complaint that "some other guy" is a paper MCSE from a braindump. I want to see both the paper AND experience, same as I would in hiring a truck driver.

  • Drew
    8 years ago
    Jul 12, 2004

    The reason companies no longer pay more for MCSEs is because they have been burned too many times with paper MCSEs. During the boom you couldn't throw a stone without hitting a BOOT CAMP that promised you your MCSE in a week. These people had no real knowledge of the systems and could only answer questions "the Microsoft way", as one employer told me.
    Because companies were sold on the idea that MCSE equated to knowledgeable administrators, they quickly became disillusioned. Now the letters MCSE don't get you much. From the start MS should have looked at creating tests and testing methods that assured qualified candidates rather than a quick buck and an army of MCSEs to preach the MS way.
    You may note that some certifications like CISCO still command much from hiring companies.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here
  • SP1?
    I know there is a SP1 for SQL 2008 R2 available....and there is a "feature pack" as well... ...
  • SQL database mirroring
    I have SQL Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64bit on Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise 64bit.  Each SQL Server has...
  • Dell Compellent Disk Drive
    Does anybody has experience with Dell Compellent Disk Drive? Basically, this system manages all disk...
  • Sql server performance tuning
    I need to find a tool that help me to optimize sql server,queries,improve the performance and solve ...