http://www.sqlmag.com/authors/author/author/5063582/rsscomment/5063582en-USFri, 25 May 2012 10:41:31 GMTFri, 25 May 2012 10:41:31 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/configuration/put-the-hammer-down#commentsAnchorThu, 06 Jan 2005 13:17:38 GMT
If the multiple partitions are sharing physical disks, wouldn’t this behave the same as having two file groups on the same disk, i.e. little benefit?]]>billtwomey Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:17:38 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/configuration/put-the-hammer-down#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/configuration/put-the-hammer-down#commentsAnchorFri, 03 Jan 2003 06:49:38 GMT
The best practice if for Log files to be placed separately from data files on RAID 1 or RAID 1 + 0, not RAID 5 as you tested. Perhaps there would be better performance on a RAID 1 array for the log files and a separate RAID 5 array for data?]]>lhonhart Fri, 03 Jan 2003 06:49:38 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/configuration/put-the-hammer-down#commentsAnchor