http://www.sqlmag.com/authors/author/author/5777835/rsscomment/5777835en-USFri, 25 May 2012 09:24:41 GMTFri, 25 May 2012 09:24:41 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/group-policy/review-group-policy-management-tools#commentsAnchorTue, 03 Apr 2012 19:58:27 GMT
NetWrix offers a free tool vs. Group Policy Change Reporter (www.netwrix.com) that is good for tracking and reporting on Group Policy changes--the tool tracks newly created and deleted GPOs, GPO link changes, password policy, software deployment, user desktops, changes made to audit policy, and other settings. ]]>Lorenzo0o0Tue, 03 Apr 2012 19:58:27 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/group-policy/review-group-policy-management-tools#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/4-ad-management-tools#commentsAnchorSun, 11 Mar 2012 10:20:59 GMT
Anyone evaluated or have any experience with netwrix active directory change reporter? Were in the process of evaluating both the netwrix tool and the manageegine tool, and were actually leaning towards the netwrix tool because it has better audit capabilities. Anyone have an opinion or experience with these companies?]]>Lorenzo0o0Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:20:59 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/4-ad-management-tools#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/tools/active-directory-auditing-tools-139873#commentsAnchorWed, 07 Mar 2012 19:15:42 GMT
Thanks for the insight. We evaluated all 6 of these and wound up going with netwrix AD change reporter. The new version does offer real-time change alerting, so that was a big factor for us. It was also bar far the most affordable.]]>Lorenzo0o0Wed, 07 Mar 2012 19:15:42 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/tools/active-directory-auditing-tools-139873#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/4-ad-management-tools#commentsAnchorSat, 25 Feb 2012 05:10:02 GMT
Great article, Eric, thanks For sure it will be very helpful for people who choosing a product for AD management. I think one more product worth to be mentioned, it is Softerra Adaxes.]]>MarkSat, 25 Feb 2012 05:10:02 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/4-ad-management-tools#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/networking/comparative-review-network-management-tools-141373#commentsAnchorWed, 25 Jan 2012 09:43:19 GMT
I wished the reviews of the products were more in depth. WIth Spiceworks, its monitoring and alerting capabilities weren't even mentioned.]]>RichWed, 25 Jan 2012 09:43:19 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/networking/comparative-review-network-management-tools-141373#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/networking/comparative-review-network-management-tools-141373#commentsAnchorWed, 25 Jan 2012 09:40:23 GMT
I found the details of the products capabilities to be light. Especially the monitoring and alerting features of Spiceworks.]]>RichWed, 25 Jan 2012 09:40:23 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/networking/comparative-review-network-management-tools-141373#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/tools/active-directory-auditing-tools-139873#commentsAnchorWed, 14 Sep 2011 14:02:27 GMT
In response to this comparative review, I would like to point out a few inaccuracies and add a couple important points. Version 6 of ADCR is more than two years old and Version 7 was released July 2011 with the features that were reported absent. Missing features now included are: Real-time (e-mail/SMS) alerts, e-mail report subscription capabilities, and improved Windows 2008-compatible configuration wizards. Both Versions 6 and 7 offer a number of predefined compliance reports with Version 7 receiving nearly double the number of reports (60+) available in Version 6. All these reports in both versions were capable of being automatically delivered via e-mail on a daily basis. More reports are available from NetWrix upon request. The audit data stored in SQL can be archived for 7+ years as needed and data collection agents are optional though recommended for larger deployments. Before and after setting information is also captured and the Object Restore feature can restore individual object attributes in addition to objects themselves making this a more advanced offering than native AD restore options as this information is not contained in the AD Recycle Bin or Tombstones. Our technical staff is also more than happy to assist any customers that need setup help at no cost. I found it reassuring that Erics recommendations were added in Version 7 and that tells me that we are on the right path to delivering tools to help systems administrators meet their auditing and compliance goals. Thank You, Chris Rich Product Manager NetWrix Corporation NetWrix is #1 for Change Auditing and Compliance: Simple, Lightweight, Affordable]]>ChrisWed, 14 Sep 2011 14:02:27 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/tools/active-directory-auditing-tools-139873#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/tools/active-directory-auditing-tools-139873#commentsAnchorFri, 02 Sep 2011 09:42:44 GMT
Informative article on tools that can help firms pass SOX and HIPPA requirements. Eric helps us address security and business concerns with this review. Working with Eric in the Minasi group, his IT experience comes through in everything he does and it gives us reason to have confidence in Eric's advice and direction in the review. I do wonder why some vendors base their price on AD users and others on Domain Controllers.]]>SCGFri, 02 Sep 2011 09:42:44 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/tools/active-directory-auditing-tools-139873#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/task-scheduling/tool-time-sydi-makes-documenting-servers-simple#commentsAnchorThu, 04 Nov 2010 12:02:47 GMT
If you are interested in SYDI you may also be interested in XIA Configuration which supports SQL databases, Exchange, IIS, change tracking and PDF output.

Information about the free version (Workgroup Edition) can be found on the site but there is also a commerical version for larger networks.

http://centrel-solutions.com/xiaconfiguration/sydi.aspx
]]>David HomerThu, 04 Nov 2010 12:02:47 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/task-scheduling/tool-time-sydi-makes-documenting-servers-simple#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/systems-management/essential-windows-server-2008-r2-features#commentsAnchorThu, 19 Aug 2010 12:15:36 GMT
Hi all, you’ll find the sidebar at the following link, which is essentially page 4 of this article. Thanks!

http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-management/Essential-Windows-Server-2008-R2-Features/4.aspx]]>Jason BovbergThu, 19 Aug 2010 12:15:36 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/systems-management/essential-windows-server-2008-r2-features#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/systems-management/essential-windows-server-2008-r2-features#commentsAnchorMon, 09 Aug 2010 11:09:58 GMT
The print article says the sidebar is "web-exclusive" but someone apparently forgot to tell the website team.

Considering the length of time since kim lung’s post, one has to wonder if anyone from Penton even reads these comments.]]>IT JugglerMon, 09 Aug 2010 11:09:58 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/systems-management/essential-windows-server-2008-r2-features#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/systems-management/essential-windows-server-2008-r2-features#commentsAnchorTue, 03 Aug 2010 07:56:00 GMT
I agree, where is the sidebar "A Simple File Server Migration" listed in the article above?]]>WilliamsTue, 03 Aug 2010 07:56:00 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/systems-management/essential-windows-server-2008-r2-features#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/systems-management/essential-windows-server-2008-r2-features#commentsAnchorFri, 23 Jul 2010 19:17:07 GMT
hi,
where’s the sidebar "A Simple File Server Migration."?]]>kim lungFri, 23 Jul 2010 19:17:07 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/systems-management/essential-windows-server-2008-r2-features#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/group-policy/review-group-policy-management-tools#commentsAnchorWed, 19 May 2010 00:34:21 GMT
TechBlue Software is a recognized leader in the Software Development field, having helped a range of organizations in their mission to cut down their costs while retaining or increasing the level of quality of their software.

Active Directory Password Reset Solution (ADPR) is TechBlueSoftware flagship product for active directory user management.TechBlue Software provides solution for small and large businesses. Specializing in custom development and well crafted products.

For More details
You can refer: http://www.techbluesoftware.com]]>Techblue SoftwareWed, 19 May 2010 00:34:21 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/group-policy/review-group-policy-management-tools#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/active-directory/2-tools-to-restore-active-directory-objects-#commentsAnchorFri, 09 Apr 2010 09:20:02 GMT
Eric,
Thanks for reviewing our product and taking the time to put together a very well-written articlenicely done.
Just to add a note to your free Active Directory solutions section, Id just like to point out that the NetWrix Active Directory Restore Wizard is also free, because it has a freeware edition. That means it should be included in the free tools section above. The NetWrix free roll back wizard offers superior rollback functionality than that offered by similar tools, as the NetWrix solution enables restoration of deleted objects with attributes, as well as modified attribute values. The difference between the freeware and commercial is the depth of restore (freeware can restore only last 4 days).
Another quick note on from scratch AD restoration. While other roll back solutions, such as Quest, may allow restoration of the entire DC from scratch on new hardware, most organizations have multiple domain controllers and the odds of them all dying at the same time are slim, making this feature somewhat obsolete. Instead, object-level and attribute-level restoration serve a much more practical need.
Once again, thanks for the review,
Stephen Schimmel
Product Manager
NetWrix Corporation
www.netwrix.com
]]>SchimmelFri, 09 Apr 2010 09:20:02 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/active-directory/2-tools-to-restore-active-directory-objects-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/4-ad-management-tools#commentsAnchorTue, 26 Jan 2010 21:04:21 GMT
AH!!! Eric I was pleasantly reminded that Quest in fact owns Script Logic. I am a fan of Quest and their PosH cmdlets. Which in turn makes me want to check out their offering even more. Great article! Informative and concise as always. Keep up the great work.]]>TimTue, 26 Jan 2010 21:04:21 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/4-ad-management-tools#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorTue, 26 Jan 2010 19:54:58 GMT
This problem is NOT FIXED. I have 20 years in IT and i am removing WHS. I have lost files for the 5th time due to tombsotone / access denied crap.. i’m SICK of IT. Hardware ran fine for months with SBS and win2k3. This program has issues with length of file path, and still data corruption. I posted it on the WHS support and they closed the ticket. WTF??? I can and have duplicated this problem. FIX IT! (it does it with no paower pack and with powerpacks) PS I am running OEM version with powerpack 3.]]>MitchTue, 26 Jan 2010 19:54:58 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/4-ad-management-tools#commentsAnchorTue, 26 Jan 2010 16:04:25 GMT
For sure this a must read for administrators that are still looking at their Active Directory DCs as NT 4.0 boxes. Your article reveals what admins should be looking at. Recently an IT manager installed MSCRM on one of his domain controllers because he thought is wasn’t doing much. I will forward them a link to this article. Seems to me this is a good part of the AD educational process that must be on going. I really like the introduction of the article. Thanks again Eric for all the work involved in this piece. Curt Spanburgh, MVP.]]>CURTTue, 26 Jan 2010 16:04:25 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/4-ad-management-tools#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/4-ad-management-tools#commentsAnchorTue, 26 Jan 2010 12:56:59 GMT
Excellent article Eric. I was a bit surprised not to see something from Script Logic in the comparison. I would have liked to hear your thoughts on it when compared to Quest’s offering. Tim]]>TimTue, 26 Jan 2010 12:56:59 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/4-ad-management-tools#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/migration/plan-and-execute-an-active-directory-merger-part-2#commentsAnchorWed, 23 Dec 2009 13:41:46 GMT
Please, see the Microsoft support limitations topic "Restructuring Limitations" at http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee424329(WS.10).aspx for critical information on they types of merger and acquisition restructures that are not supported.]]>KurtWed, 23 Dec 2009 13:41:46 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/migration/plan-and-execute-an-active-directory-merger-part-2#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/domains2/plan-and-execute-an-active-directory-merger-part-1#commentsAnchorMon, 28 Sep 2009 12:55:27 GMT
Good use of GPO for controlling user Desktops. Few admins get the chance to do a migration like this so it’s really helpful to get a scope of what’s involved. I’m sure there are many more details, but there is only so much space in a Magazine Article. We know this comes from real world experience. Thanks Eric Curt Spanburgh, MVP.]]>CURTMon, 28 Sep 2009 12:55:27 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/domains2/plan-and-execute-an-active-directory-merger-part-1#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/domains2/plan-and-execute-an-active-directory-merger-part-1#commentsAnchorMon, 28 Sep 2009 10:21:23 GMT
Great article. This was exactly what I needed for my current company merger and I signed up for the monthly service just to read this. I was not disappointed and am anxiously awaiting part 2 since I am to that stage now. Thanks!]]>jsedlaczek@grindmaster.com Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:21:23 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/domains2/plan-and-execute-an-active-directory-merger-part-1#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/task-scheduling/tool-time-sydi-makes-documenting-servers-simple#commentsAnchorTue, 08 Sep 2009 21:57:55 GMT
You can get a neat little tid-bit here http://web2.minasi.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=25993 If you want the entire script you can email me and I will be glad to send it your way. Please send any good updates and or fixes to Patrick Ogenstad who has provided this GREAT tool at a ridicules price,,, FREE!!!]]>TimTue, 08 Sep 2009 21:57:55 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/task-scheduling/tool-time-sydi-makes-documenting-servers-simple#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorSun, 05 Jul 2009 20:23:55 GMT
Your Comments (required):]]>Name (required): Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:23:55 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/group-policy/review-group-policy-management-tools#commentsAnchorThu, 18 Jun 2009 08:58:00 GMT
You mentioned active administrator in your previous article "3 Tools to Manage Group Policy". Hands down, I think it’s the best for active directory and group policy management. This product has been around for awhile. I’m on version 5.1 now and there were a number enhancements to the installation procedure, usability and auditing procedure.]]>PrestonThu, 18 Jun 2009 08:58:00 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/group-policy/review-group-policy-management-tools#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/firewalls3/setting-up-vpn-authentication-via-radius#commentsAnchorTue, 09 Jun 2009 09:38:14 GMT
Thanks Eric, nice article. Always nice to see how other HW Vendors support this. The latest Sonicwall NSA devices support LDAP integration for VPN Clients. No need for a RADIUS server on your network, you just point to a Domain Controller and configure the LDAP settings. Regards]]>JamesTue, 09 Jun 2009 09:38:14 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/firewalls3/setting-up-vpn-authentication-via-radius#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorFri, 27 Feb 2009 09:42:21 GMT
The reason for this is that the WHS OS uses the first drive as a landing pad for all file transfers. Your first drive is approx. 74 GB broken into 20 GB for the OS and about 50 GB remaining. That would limit your max file transfer to around 50 GB.]]>MatthewFri, 27 Feb 2009 09:42:21 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/digital-music2/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-3#commentsAnchorThu, 18 Dec 2008 10:19:57 GMT
Eric: i tried linux as a home server and it just didnt suit the needs of the family in respect to compatibility, ease of use, and (god damn) sharing ntfs partitions that have some other owner. i really liked your thoughts on WHS and my question is simple: is WHS more stable than XP? thanks in advance.]]>kr0ss Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:19:57 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/digital-music2/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-3#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-6#commentsAnchorWed, 05 Nov 2008 08:41:44 GMT
text icons problem to repeir]]>ponx1972 Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:41:44 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-6#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-6#commentsAnchorWed, 05 Nov 2008 08:40:40 GMT
Your Comments (required):]]>Name (required): Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:40:40 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-6#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/networking/link-analyst#commentsAnchorMon, 29 Sep 2008 22:54:13 GMT
Eric’s straight forward eval of the product got my interest in trying it. Thanks Eric for pointing us to something we can use.]]>CURTMon, 29 Sep 2008 22:54:13 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/networking/link-analyst#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorMon, 21 Jul 2008 11:04:58 GMT
I’m using WHS with 3 SATA-drives. The first drive with the system is a raptor 74gb. The two other ones are 500gb each. The strange thing is that I can’t transfer more data to the server than the raptor can hold. It makes no difference if I use the consol, shared folders or anything else. The two others drives are reported to be healthy, and the total storage space is round 1tb. But can’t copy more than 50gb of data before it says there no space for it. Anyone?]]>simonMon, 21 Jul 2008 11:04:58 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/3-disk-imaging-solutions#commentsAnchorThu, 29 May 2008 10:04:02 GMT
Thanks for the heads-up, and I’m glad you found the article helfpul! The text problem is fixed.]]>JasonThu, 29 May 2008 10:04:02 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/3-disk-imaging-solutions#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/3-disk-imaging-solutions#commentsAnchorThu, 29 May 2008 01:19:56 GMT
Very usefull article. Could the editor please edit the second paragraph of the Editor’s choice to remove the erroneous Copy/Paste operation? TIA. JQJ.]]>JanThu, 29 May 2008 01:19:56 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/3-disk-imaging-solutions#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/performance/3-enterprise-disk-defragmenters#commentsAnchorTue, 29 Apr 2008 12:46:19 GMT
The automatic defragmentation approach seems to be the most innovative, compared to the rather antiquated scheduled defrag route. The ability of the defragmentation software to manage everything autonomously without admin supervision is really amazing. In an corporate IT environment with busy/many servers, auto defrag would yield the maximum benefit in terms of manpower, time and costs savings.]]>SancreTue, 29 Apr 2008 12:46:19 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/performance/3-enterprise-disk-defragmenters#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/2-ways-to-prevent-rogue-devices-from-stealing-your-data#commentsAnchorFri, 18 Apr 2008 15:27:40 GMT
I apologize for the figure error. Figures 1 and 2 were inadvertently swapped. They’re fixed now. I’ll contact Eric about the other items and have him chime in here. Thanks for reading!]]>JasonFri, 18 Apr 2008 15:27:40 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/2-ways-to-prevent-rogue-devices-from-stealing-your-data#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-4#commentsAnchorMon, 14 Apr 2008 18:21:31 GMT
Passwords? Who uses passwords in a family? Must we have them or only the same username? PS, no idea what the username is on my Vista laptop. It just starts (very slowly) at the desktop. I presume I am going to have problems when I get WHS (after the bug is fixed)]]>johnMon, 14 Apr 2008 18:21:31 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-4#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorWed, 09 Apr 2008 15:34:15 GMT
Great feedback, Dan. THANKS. The "Power Pack" is supposed to have the "backup the backup" feature that you are requesting. I’m trying to get my hands on a pre-release copy..... Standby to standby... :-)]]>Eric B. Rux Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:34:15 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorTue, 08 Apr 2008 19:32:16 GMT
I have been running a WHS since beta (running on an old Dell FF), I have currently attached (2) 500GB and (1) 350GB drives (just what I had lying around at the time) via USB and have not been subjected to any corruption issues. And yes, I know they exist… While I have not used any of the programs mentioned in the KB article to save data to WHS, I have moved a good deal of Data to them as well (iTunes backups – Scanned Documents – Pics – along with many progs, DBs, and other data) with no corruption issues. Also the server is backing up 2 laptops and 1 desktop. One improvement I would suggest for WHS is to have an easily accessible way to backup to external media. This would allow a great deal of relief to WHS users until the fix is released and allow users to get backups off disk and offsite. Another option would be to allow for a functionality to interact with SkyDrive and push backups into the cloud. Running a little long here, so I will step down now. :)]]>DanTue, 08 Apr 2008 19:32:16 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-4#commentsAnchorTue, 08 Apr 2008 19:31:22 GMT
I would have to agree that Microsoft did it right with WHS. I work in a highly technical environment with multiple AD Domains, even scaled down for a handful of users; any form of AD would be overkill. IMO At the same time, I would be comfortable recommending this for family members that have little or no technical experience. "You have to walk before you can crawl"]]>RobTue, 08 Apr 2008 19:31:22 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-4#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorMon, 24 Mar 2008 11:09:32 GMT
I had originally read that the bug only surfaced on WHS systems where folder duplication was enabled. Your article makes it clear that the problem is with any WHS system that has multiple drives and I can confirm this. I had added a second 500 gb drive to my HP MediaSmart server last week. My Outlook PST file and my Quicken 2007 data files both developed consistency errors the very next time I used them. I was able to run the ScanPST and Quicken verify functions to correct the errors but then had to move those two data sets off the WHS and onto my local machine. Looking forward to the patch. Other than that I really like WHS.]]>RandyMon, 24 Mar 2008 11:09:32 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorWed, 19 Mar 2008 21:39:37 GMT
I took an old machine, threw a couple of hard drives in it, and installed the trial version of Windows Home Server. So far, it’s running like a dream. The trial allows for 120 days of use, so it’ll get a good workout.]]>Jim Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:39:37 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorWed, 19 Mar 2008 20:44:28 GMT
Sanders, I have the same unit, and I’m getting ready to add some drives too. I’ll report back what I find out.... Thanks for the feedback!]]>Eric B. Rux Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:44:28 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorWed, 19 Mar 2008 20:40:58 GMT
Chris, Those are all good questions. I’ll see what I can come up with. Oh, and it’s 240 characters (according to the WHS Tech Brief that I read)]]>Eric B. Rux Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:40:58 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorWed, 19 Mar 2008 16:52:41 GMT
One more thing … I suspect that this mapping is also the reason that path names longer than 250 characters causes a problem with the “Drive health” status.]]>ChristoperWed, 19 Mar 2008 16:52:41 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorWed, 19 Mar 2008 16:41:31 GMT
I have been building my own WHS in hopes of replacing an outdated server, but this model does make some things more difficult. The first problem that WHS does not solve the “what happens if the boot HD fails?” If you take a look at the drive manager you would notice that if that happens you would be in big trouble. WHS does not automatically provide RAID 1, mirroring, of the system drive. This paradigm also makes running other server oriented tools a little tough. Say I want a CVS server to run there. How about a DDNS client? It is not overly clear what can and cannot be done. I will continue to play…]]>Chirs Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:41:31 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorWed, 19 Mar 2008 16:26:59 GMT
Hey, is this why i periodically get a message that there are hard disk errors? I bought the HP unit with 500G base drive and added two 1TB drives. Periodically it tells me to run a some sort of utility (can’t remember) and then it says the drive is "all better now." Should i believe it? Is my data safe?]]>Sanders Partee Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:26:59 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-5#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-4#commentsAnchorSun, 24 Feb 2008 14:18:28 GMT
I agree with the steps Microsoft took. If you consider the issues encountered when managing even the smallest AD Database, local accounts simplify things drastically. It reduces the overhead on the server as well as takes into consideration that most home users are not going to know to look at the server if they have even the most basic login problems on the desktop or laptop.]]>StephenSun, 24 Feb 2008 14:18:28 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-4#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-4#commentsAnchorSat, 23 Feb 2008 04:04:12 GMT
Microsoft screwed up badly in the User Accounts aspect of WHS. For a company that is known for writing computer user GUI’s that are simple to use for the non-technical, for it not to be able to present an AD based GUI system to manage user accounts is a travesty. SBS is very close to what one needs, just wrap it a bit better and you have a great user account management system for the non-technical user.]]>Colin Contessa Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:04:12 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-4#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/2-ways-to-prevent-rogue-devices-from-stealing-your-data#commentsAnchorFri, 15 Feb 2008 19:16:04 GMT
Very good review, especially regarding DeviceLock’s superior use of GPOs & RSoP, which is right on the money. But having used DL for years, there are some slight inaccuracies and/or additional info that may help readers. First, "Figure 1" is NOT a pic of DeviceLock in a GPO (must be the other solution’s 32-bit gui interface (ick)). DL has a much nicer look/feel in MMC tree format that snaps in under AD GP’s Computer Configuration section in the GPO. Second, DL doesn’t really "require" MSSQL or the server for access control of any kind. MSSQL (or MSEE) is only needed for the back end of the optional DL Ent. Server (DLES) that is only currently used for central auto-collection of audit logs/shadowed data. Without DLES (and SQL), you can still use the very powerful DL Ent. Mgr (DLEM) console to select/view/sort/filter all logs and shadow data from any number of endpoints at one time. The DLES just helps auto-collect it all to a central point for an auditor’s convenience and to clean off the data from the endpoints. Third, it would be easier to just add the DL service EXE name to the Windows firewall’s exception app list (which the latest DL install does for XP/Vista/W2K3) than to configure the ports, but no big deal there. Fourth, DL’s default security of the service is very good, but the DeviceLock Administrators policy feature further locks down all the DL components from any local administrator tampering such that DL protection cannot be stopped via registry hacks, via tasks/processes, in Safe Mode, etc. Fifth, in my recollection DL’s license pricing also includes first year maintenance, and volume pricing beyond unit=1 shown is very reasonable. Again, very good article by Mr Lux with just a few items to add/correct. - Matty]]>DavidFri, 15 Feb 2008 19:16:04 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/2-ways-to-prevent-rogue-devices-from-stealing-your-data#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/2-ways-to-prevent-rogue-devices-from-stealing-your-data#commentsAnchorFri, 08 Feb 2008 16:39:10 GMT
Most reviews simply cover features. Eric has gives us much more than the "car salesman" driving us around the block from the dealership. He’s one of us who ’Breaking Trail" for IT managers. His discriptions have that look and feel of us sitting next to him as he deploys the package. Keep it up. This is the way reviews were ment to be.]]>CURTFri, 08 Feb 2008 16:39:10 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/product-review/2-ways-to-prevent-rogue-devices-from-stealing-your-data#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/digital-music2/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-3#commentsAnchorThu, 07 Feb 2008 18:12:07 GMT
Mohammad: While spinning the company and fanboy line is great at times, at others it just falls flat. Linux is NOT more stable on any hardware, its stable on certain hardware and less stable on others; just as Windows is. In fact, on servers I’ve admined running windows the vast majority of crashes or problems were hardware related - not windows. The same with linux. Any software issues could either be traced to misconfiguration (especially in the case of linux) or shody drivers (in both cases) Having said that, Linux is great if you want a minimal install, vast configurability and most importantly - dirt cheap cost (if you dont mind finding all the support yourself). There is however no direct comparison between WHS and Linux. Yes, you can get close (with Samba, rsync, RAID, LVM, Apache and...wow...thats alot to configure and setup and...monitor) but its no where near as easy or as fire and forget. Btw, the first thing you do with a copy of Windows is patch. Same as with Linux. Then, if mom and pop are going to be using the computer - install AV]]>ChristoperThu, 07 Feb 2008 18:12:07 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/digital-music2/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-3#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/digital-music2/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-3#commentsAnchorWed, 23 Jan 2008 23:39:27 GMT
Hello! Evolution is not what only Microsoft is doing, Linux is more stable on any hardware and you don’t need to be Administrator all the time, more over help is available without spending hard cash. The thing you valued money and Linux is free and also more dependable. The very first thing after installing a fresh copy of windows is to install Anti Virus and Anti Spyware software. A new piece of intelligent code (Virus) crash a windows machine in no time to start you from zero! You can not compare Elephant with mole. And don’t blame Linux for your faulty scripts! Now lets talk Windows! Regards,]]>Mohammad Hasnain Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:39:27 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/digital-music2/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-3#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-2#commentsAnchorSat, 19 Jan 2008 11:29:17 GMT
@John: you can get add-ons to accommodate leaving systems running 24/7 - WOL etc... good stuff]]>darrenSat, 19 Jan 2008 11:29:17 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-2#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/digital-music2/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-3#commentsAnchorWed, 16 Jan 2008 22:08:42 GMT
db: Check out this post on Mark Minasi’s Forum. It discusses the corruption issue in more detail: http://www.minasi.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=25144 In short, some very specific things have to happen in order for the files to become corrupt. That doesn’t change the fact that it’s a bad bug and it needs to be fixed....but it also has to be put in perspective. As Nick says in the post, "Don’t Panic. Thanks for the feedback. :-)]]>Eric B. Rux Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:08:42 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/digital-music2/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-3#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/digital-music2/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-3#commentsAnchorWed, 16 Jan 2008 20:49:19 GMT
is it a myth that WHS corrupts files? that seems to be a very serious problem.]]>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:49:19 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/digital-music2/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-3#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/digital-music2/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-3#commentsAnchorWed, 16 Jan 2008 16:40:03 GMT
I took part in the Beta 2 release of WHS, and I really like the product. I now have the HP MediaSmart 1TB server at home and I have installed several of the additional components that have been developed. My family likes the ability to connect to it and view pictures of our new grandson.]]>RobertWed, 16 Jan 2008 16:40:03 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/digital-music2/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-3#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorTue, 04 Dec 2007 15:35:19 GMT
What if your WHS server computer crashes (i.e. how do you back up the backup?)?]]>Jim Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:35:19 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-2#commentsAnchorThu, 22 Nov 2007 17:11:03 GMT
As an ex IT Support Manager, I know the hassle of conventional back-up systems and would like to have WHS at home to back up our 4 computers. However, I don’t relish the idea of leaving everything switched on overnight. Firstly, I’ve never yet met a silent computer and one of the systems is in a bedroom. Secondly, we are being actively encouraged by Government and the Green lobby to turn things off to save energy, carbon emissions etc. Thirdly, any piece of electrical equipment can potentially go wrong and overheat, particularly lap-tops so using WHS is a potential fire hazard? Finally, no matter what Firewalls, anti-virus etc you may have, the longer a computer is on (and connected to the Internet), the more chances are that it will be hacked and/or your data corrupted etc. WHS - yes, I’d like to have it, but, there is a price over and above the hard-earned pounds to buy it in the first place.]]>johnThu, 22 Nov 2007 17:11:03 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-2#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-2#commentsAnchorThu, 22 Nov 2007 14:09:47 GMT
I’m pretty psyched about WHS, however, I’m concerned about the Remote Access portion of product. Specifically, the conflicts with the ISP service agreements which prohibit running a server on your residential connection. Is this being addressed? I can’t believe Microsoft is releasing a product that will have some of it’s major features (photo websites, remote client access, etc.) blocked by the ISP’s. I still see the value in using the server on my home network, but access from the internet is a big part of WHS’s appeal.]]>John Pierce Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:09:47 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-2#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-2#commentsAnchorWed, 21 Nov 2007 18:26:15 GMT
There are lots of reasons for changing the defaults for backup. I’ve extended the window to 10 AM, so that I can turn on a desktop which doesn’t do power management well in the morning and get it backed up, then use it through the day via Remote Desktop. I also have set retention to essentially forever. Because of the storage scheme, the space used does not grow rapidly.]]>bill sanderson Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:26:15 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-2#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/change-and-configuration-management/3-tools-to-manage-group-policy-#commentsAnchorWed, 14 Nov 2007 07:19:31 GMT
Great article Eric! There is not a wasted line of text… Meaning, you explain and lay things out so that an Admin at my level (knows enough to be dangerous) can easily follow along; as well as someone at say, Mark Minasi’s level. There is great info for everyone, regardless of their skill level. Keep them coming! Tim Bolton]]>TimWed, 14 Nov 2007 07:19:31 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/change-and-configuration-management/3-tools-to-manage-group-policy-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorThu, 18 Oct 2007 09:31:01 GMT
Jon, HP will be the first partner to come out with a box preloaded with WHS. It should be "any day now", from what I’ve heard. I’ll have a review on the HP device on WHSHelp.com as soon as it is released. Thanks for the feedback! Eric]]>Eric B. Rux Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:31:01 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorThu, 18 Oct 2007 09:31:01 GMT
Jon, HP will be the first partner to come out with a box preloaded with WHS. It should be "any day now", from what I’ve heard. I’ll have a review on the HP device on WHSHelp.com as soon as it is released. Thanks for the feedback! Eric]]>Eric B. Rux Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:31:01 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorThu, 18 Oct 2007 07:18:34 GMT
HAven’t been able to find any Hardware with WHS preloaded that is coming out. I know that HP is coming out with a box but can’t find anything on it on their web site. Do you have any links to hardware devices coming out with WHS on it?]]>JonThu, 18 Oct 2007 07:18:34 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorWed, 17 Oct 2007 20:25:09 GMT
I agree about the Linux. Gee, I could probably do the same thing with Assembler if I had a notion. Linux is great for people who have nothing better to do than fiddle and tweak and such. I don’t want Linux. I use Windows for a reason. It’s simple and compatible and pretty straight-forward. It’s not perfect, but nothing else is, either. About time for the WHS! It will also be great for those little businesses that simply can’t afford a year’s profit for SBS (cost, administration, etc.), too. A lot of small business owners have Windows Home Edition and have their hands tied because Microsoft wants so much just to upgrade to Pro. WHS will be a big help in letting those owners have a lot more control over their networks without having to sell their kids.]]>jonathanWed, 17 Oct 2007 20:25:09 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorWed, 17 Oct 2007 16:45:09 GMT
Every time I read about WHS there is some Linux guy claiming he can do that for less. They just don’t seem to get the point that very few people want to spend the time and effort to Do That. Like my 87 year old mother, shee wants a box she can plug-in and forget and have it provide her needs. I expect to use WHS in my home and supply it for my son (who is nearing a Phd in computer science) for it simplicity and ease of use. Who has the time do do the Linux thing? I don’t and I am a retired hardware/ software designer. Ron]]>RONALD LEEWed, 17 Oct 2007 16:45:09 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorWed, 17 Oct 2007 16:21:25 GMT
Seth, I understand about the nagging! That can become real annoying. I think I found a fix: Right click on the WHS icon ON YOUR PC. Choose “Display Network Health Notifications” so that it is no longer checked. You will probably have to do this for each PC that is nagging you. Does this stop the notifications that are bothering you? Let me know! Thanks for the comments! Eric]]>Eric B. Rux Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:21:25 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorWed, 17 Oct 2007 16:14:21 GMT
Ray, I’m really glad that you’re into Linux. I also like Linux…I like it so much that I even wrote an article with my coworker about how to authenticate Linux hosts to Active Directory. (http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/96592/96592.html) However, I have to respectfully disagree with you that Linux can do what WHS can do. Sure, you and I could set it up with some SAMBA shares…and we could also craft up some trick scripts to backup our Windows boxes. But I don’t believe that this is an option for most people. WHS also has features that set it apart. SUPER simple remote connectivity is just a few clicks away. Restoring a PC after a complete hard drive failure is also a breeze if you use the bootable restore CD. Thanks for the comments! Eric]]>Eric B. Rux Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:14:21 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorWed, 17 Oct 2007 13:58:56 GMT
I loaded the last RC Beta. The only drawback was the nagging. I don’t leave any machines on all the time, except a Dell running the WHS. Every time I turn on any of the machines, it reminded me that so and so machine had not been backed up in XX days. The released version may give you more options here! I hope!]]>KamalWed, 17 Oct 2007 13:58:56 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorTue, 16 Oct 2007 09:09:51 GMT
Tried it (beta). Pretty simple setup, even plays with others servers, but not going to pay $200 for something my Linux servers have been doing for a long time.]]>rayTue, 16 Oct 2007 09:09:51 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/home-networking/coming-home-to-windows-home-server-part-1#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/configuration/let-s-get-organized-file-server-basics#commentsAnchorFri, 08 Jun 2007 01:34:05 GMT
"Be sure to teach users the difference between moving and copying" - good point. However its worth noting the technical issue that a file/folder move from one folder to another on the same server will also bring the existing NTFS permissions and potentially undo all your good set up work, wherea a copy will leave these behind. Perhaps users should be encouraged to move files/folders to a structure that is used as a staging area and then IT staff peform a copy & delete to the final destination to cleanse unwanted permissions.]]>DuncanFri, 08 Jun 2007 01:34:05 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/configuration/let-s-get-organized-file-server-basics#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/configuration/let-s-get-organized-file-server-basics#commentsAnchorThu, 24 May 2007 21:41:26 GMT
Good artical, but in the printer frendly version Figure 6 is cut off!!]]>norris.norman.c2@edumail.vic.gov.au Thu, 24 May 2007 21:41:26 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/configuration/let-s-get-organized-file-server-basics#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/dns/dns-ad-rescue#commentsAnchorThu, 10 May 2007 03:53:13 GMT
Very useful article because we are planing a similar upgrade and that’s an issue we are going to pay a big attention to. A.F.Simoes]]>Alvaro F.Thu, 10 May 2007 03:53:13 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/dns/dns-ad-rescue#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/dns/plan-your-dive-dive-your-plan#commentsAnchorThu, 22 Feb 2007 15:43:13 GMT
I found the article inspiring as I am working in a very seat-of-the-pants organisation at the moment that I am trying to bring into some sort of shape prior to implementing ITIL. This gives me more ammunition to take to my board to get their support.]]>AndrewThu, 22 Feb 2007 15:43:13 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/dns/plan-your-dive-dive-your-plan#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/dns/plan-your-dive-dive-your-plan#commentsAnchorMon, 05 Feb 2007 20:13:17 GMT
It’s a good article, would be much more better if provide other scenario as well.]]>TanMon, 05 Feb 2007 20:13:17 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/dns/plan-your-dive-dive-your-plan#commentsAnchorhttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/dns/dns-ad-rescue#commentsAnchorTue, 30 Jan 2007 17:59:00 GMT
Great catch and troubleshooting, Eric. This was a classic example of how the OS gets upgraded but the administrator does not. A failure to upgrade from NT 4.0 think to Windows AD/DNS think. Thanks for giving the IT community a nudge to put a torch on the permafrost of IT worker training. I hope this person gets a subscription to Windows IT Pro. Each issue is like an IT class. Curt Spanburgh.]]>CURTTue, 30 Jan 2007 17:59:00 GMThttp://www.sqlmag.com/article/dns/dns-ad-rescue#commentsAnchor