• subscribe
February 08, 2012 03:42 PM

Microsoft Pledges Reasonable Patent Licensing, No Injunctions

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #142221

Microsoft on Wednesday published a statement in which it pledged to license its "standard essential patents" using "fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms." The statement follows a private pledge from Google to do the same with the Motorola Mobility patents, should its purchase of that company be approved by regulators.

"Microsoft's approach is straight-forward," the statement reads. "Microsoft will always adhere to the promises it has made to standards organizations to make its standard essential patents available on fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms. This means that Microsoft will not seek an injunction or exclusion order against any firm on the basis of those essential patents."

While Microsoft's statement is essentially a formalization of the actions it has already undertaken with regards to competitors using its patented technologies, that latter sentence is interesting. And it appears to be an implicit attack against Apple, which has resisted cross-licensing and has instead sought to prevent competitors from selling their devices in various companies using various legal strategies.

Other companies have adopted similar strategies against Apple as a result. Both Motorola Mobility and Samsung are trying to ban the sale of Apple devices in various countries, a "scorched earth" policy that critics say Apple brought on itself.

That said, Microsoft is currently engaged in a legal battle with Barnes & Noble, which has refused to license patents that Microsoft says the firm's Android-based NOOK devices are infringing on. One possible but remote outcome of that case is that NOOK devices could be banned for sale in the US.

Microsoft also promised that it would license its own patents without requiring licensees to cross-license their own related patents. This, too, is not necessarily new information as many of Microsoft recent patent licenses in the mobile industry have been one-way transactions.




ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • reunson
    3 months ago
    Feb 12, 2012

    Oh I see when Microsoft an Google pledge to license essential patents under FRAND terms, like they are meant to anyway, they are suddenly the good guys.

    Apple has never hesitated to license FRAND patents either.

    But when Apple asks the European Telecommunications Standards Institute, a telecommunications standards body, to establish formal rules governing how companies license their patents to one another, to stop abusers like Samsung & Motorola (2.25% of sales) then Apple is the bad guy.

    http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/paul-thurrotts-wininfo/motorola-targets-apple-microsoft-revenues-patent-suits-142213

  • fanboys suck
    3 months ago
    Feb 10, 2012

    " infiniteloop
    2 days ago
    Feb 08, 2012

    Patent Whore."

    Apple troll.

  • Meh
    3 months ago
    Feb 09, 2012

    Like slide to unlock?

  • infiniteloop
    3 months ago
    Feb 09, 2012

    @Meh:

    There's a big difference between 'essential' patents and those concerning innovation.

  • jkohut
    3 months ago
    Feb 09, 2012

    When you have to patent an innovation/idea instead of patenting a vague concept, the vast majority of these clains would be clearer from both a protection (making it easier to identify who is infringing) and from a violation (making it easier to identify if you are infringing on someone elses patent before you do it). The companies, legal system, and lawyers would probably work things out much more quickly.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here