• subscribe
August 25, 2005 12:00 AM

Windows 95 10th Anniversary Passes in Silence

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #47517

Yesterday marked the 10th anniversary of the launch of Windows 95, by far the most high-profile and successful launch in personal computing history. But the date passed without any mention of the milestone from Microsoft, which is busy preparing the ever-delayed Windows Vista, the 4th major version of Windows it will ship in the wake of Windows 95.

"Windows 95 offers far more than just excellent DOS compatibility," I wrote in February 1995, in a Windows 95 preview for a newsletter aimed at educators. "A fully redesigned 'document-centric' user-interface is easy to use and understand. The conspicuous Start button on the standard task bar begs to he pressed, revealing cascading menus containing shortcuts to programs, recently used documents, configuration options, and help. The task bar has a button for each running program, offering a quick and easy way to switch between these programs."

Ah yes, it was all so new then. But after a decade of 32-bit, multithreaded operating systems, and a mind-numbing series of electronic attacks against Windows systems, PC users are starting to become a little more jaded towards technological advances. Today's Windows versions are based on a completely different code base than Windows 95, and are much more stable and reliable. They're arguably more secure as well, though the toll of constant hacker attention is felt by all who have purchased multiple antivirus and anti-spyware solutions over the years.

Ultimately, Windows 95 was more a marketing success than a technological breakthrough. Most of the advanced technology in Windows 95 was seen previously in the little-know release of Windows for Workgroups 3.11. Where Microsoft really succeeded with Windows 95 was in convincing a mass audience to get excited about software and dump their existing PCs and upgrade. The Windows 95 launch was accompanied by a $300 million marketing campaign that included local events around the globe and the licensing of the Rolling Stones' song "Start Me Up." (Fun trivia: Microsoft originally wanted to license R.E.M. song "It's the End of the World as We Know It," but the band refused.)

Despite the hoopla at the launch, the most lasting legacy of Windows 95, of course, is the near-constant legal battles Microsoft has suffered since that operating system was in development. After failing to halt the bundling of the MSN online service with Windows 95, US regulators eventually brought Microsoft to trial for illegally bundling versions of Internet Explorer (IE) and other middleware in Windows 95, Windows 98 and other Windows versions. Since then, Microsoft has definitely lost its groove: The company and its products are rarely seen as hip or trendy, and software releases since Windows 95 have passed with little excitement in the wider world. Microsoft stock, once the darling of Wall Street, has barely moved in several years.

Products such as Xbox 360 and XP Media Center Edition are attempting to change all that, but Apple's dominance in the digital media world and Sony's dominance in video games have shuttered Microsoft thus far. It's a brand new world, one in which the software giant is competing in many markets it does not dominate. In that light, the success of Windows 95--which entered a market it was guaranteed to win--is perhaps a bit diminished. But it should still be remembered fondly as the high-point in Microsoft's history thus far. Strange that the company doesn't see it that way.

For a fun look back at Windows 95 from the eyes of a beta tester, check out my Windows 95 Preview on the SuperSite for Windows.



ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Aug 31, 2005

    Over 200 CG special effects shots created in OS X for "The Cave."

    At 25 fps (PAL) that adds up to a MASSIVE 8 SECONDS of animation!!!!

    They don't do this in Windows, folks. For a reason. It can't handle it.

    I'm pretty sure my home PC could handle 8 seconds of animation.

    The whole media industry is Mac, and over 95% of the music you listen to was recorded on a Mac.

    http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/6697/

    While YOUR music was recorded on a Mac, most of MY music was recorded on professional high fidelity audio equipment. Macs WERE probably involved, because all my CD's have cover art.

    ACTUALLY most Hollywood SPFX are produced on systems running something significantly more robust than either of these two toy OS'es.

    You may not be aware, but the OS doesn't do CG rendering. That's something called SOFTWARE. What SOFTWARE did the CG work? Guaranteed the product is available for both OS.

    As for the music industry, most Drummers are probably incapable of handling a machine with more than one mouse button.

    Seriously though, DigiDesign's Pro Tools are the duck's guts (means good for you americans) and (the software component) works flawlessly on BOTH toy OS'es.

    And to keep it slightly on topic, Pro Tools has always been available for Windows, since 95. so there.

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Aug 31, 2005

    I would have thought now the Sims is available for the Mac there would have been a reduction of these cruddy posts.

    But I was wrong.

    WHY do you Mac fans post here? Same reason Linux fans do, 'cause you got no friends?

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Aug 31, 2005

    "t would happen on OSX too (Don't lie) if you ACTUALLY HAD THAT MANY PROGRAMS TO INSTALL."

    What a crock.

    There are more software applications, hacks, shareware applications and freeware applications on the Mac platform than you can shake a stick at. Certainly more than you can fit on any hard drive available. I have 96 applications in my Mac's Applications folder, and currently 17 are running (including 3/4 of the Adobe CS suite, and not including background applications) with no discernible speed hit.

    Windows is a different story...and saying it "would happen on OSX too" is tacit admission on your part that it DOES happen on Windows. It DOES NOT happen on OSX. End of story.

    Oooh, FANCY a MAC user running Adobe products...HOLD THE FRONT PAGE!!

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Aug 31, 2005

    "OS X never slows down, it actually speeds up over time!!! "

    usually at 9.8 meters per second squared when thrown out the window.

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Aug 28, 2005

    Apples suck hard. Linux sux completely.

    The only decent OS out there is Windows [ and probably only because NT is out of DEC ].

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here