• subscribe
May 01, 1997 12:00 AM

NT News Network

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #449

The Demonstrations
Each vendor had 45 minutes for a presentation, and all the demonstrations came off without a hitch. The scenario highlighted some of the products' sophisticated multicurrency functionality, which is usually associated with high-end enterprise accounting software rather than with these vendors or this price point (typically $10,000 to $25,000 per module).

Great Plains Software's Dynamics C/S+. Great Plains Software demonstrated Dynamics C/S+, which is written in the company's 4GL, Dexterity. C/S+ is the client/server version of the Dynamics suite. Great Plains claims it has installed Dynamics C/S+ on NT in more than 4000 sites. Great Plains demonstrated primarily basic accounting functionality, although Dynamics also integrates well with other technology, such as Lotus Notes and Watermark imaging software.

In the challenge, each vendor demonstrated its product in a business scenario.

Dynamics uses a nontraditional accounting interface, which people either love or hate. Dynamics bases its interface on accounting tasks such as processes, reports, and transactions, instead of using arbitrary modules such as payables or receivables. The task options can cross conventional module boundaries, and users can assemble the options to fit their work needs. Users select tasks from customized pop-up menus. Dynamics uses task checklists to walk users through the setup of system structures--for example, to build multicurrency facilities logically by first defining currencies, then exchange rates and translation rules. Generally, the judges found that Dynamics C/S+'s functionality was a shade better in many areas than the other products' functionality.

Solomon Software's Solomon IV for Windows (SQL Server Edition). Solomon demonstrated Solomon IV, which is written in Microsoft Visual Basic (VB). Solomon IV has interesting functionality: the ability to toggle views of multicurrency data between home and source currency, flexible payment selection and point-and-click check voiding, password-protected transaction entry for documents above a predefined value, and an account inquiry screen that shows period and year-to-date balances for the current fiscal year.

Solomon IV also integrates technology well in several areas. Because it uses VB, Solomon IV lets users customize the application on the fly by modifying the events associated with its functional objects or adding scripts to customize the business rules associated with an object. Solomon IV has also integrated the popular Crystal Reports report writer so users can access the definitions of all the reports in the package and customize the reports to fit their business requirements. Solomon IV's customization capabilities make it an excellent choice for value-added resellers of vertical market accounting software or for businesses with in-house VB expertise.

State Of The Art's Acuity Financials. SOTA demonstrated Acuity Financials, the newest of the three products. Acuity draws its strength from using the latest technology, such as VB 4.0 and Object Linking and Embedding (OLE) automation. Like Solomon IV, Acuity is written in VB, integrates the Crystal Reports engine, and uses OLE automation in its functional object design and for closer integration with Microsoft's Office suite.

The integration with Office packages, such as Word for creating collection letters and Excel for entering budget values, is slick. Acuity Financials integrates email by using Microsoft Exchange to route invoice approvals. The package uses a Visioneer PaperPort desktop scanner and software to image an invoice document and then attach the image to a payables transaction. In the demonstration, SOTA previewed its forthcoming Internet accounting capabilities by using a Microsoft ActiveX component to select a vendor and make an invoice inquiry within a desktop browser. Acuity is also impressive functionally, and the judges unanimously liked the Acuity GUI, which is fully Windows 95-compliant and looked very clean and easy to use.

And the Winners Are...
The judges gave the Best Accounting Functionality award to Dynamics C/S+ and the Best Technology Integration award to Acuity Financials. Although great for the vendors' marketing machine, awards are only an indication of a package's suitability for your business. Nothing beats a thorough analysis and mapping of your specific critical functional needs and business processes onto the package's functionality.

The real winners in BackOffice accounting are the users. Microsoft BackOffice is an accounting platform that is lower cost, easier to administer, and technologically richer than any previous platform, whether mainframe-, mini-, or UNIX-based. However, BackOffice is not as scalable or as proven in handling large volumes of data as many previous popular accounting platforms; these characteristics are essential for managing the corporate accounting of large companies. But most leading accounting vendors are shipping products for BackOffice, and these products are becoming functionally broader and deeper all the time. As the enterprise and middle market vendors converge on the BackOffice platform, expect to see more pressure to lower the costs of software acquisition and implementation as well as some interesting bundling initiatives.

Great Plains Software
800-456-0025
Web: http://www.gps.com
Solomon Software
800-476-5666
Web: http://www.solomon.com
State Of The Art
800-854-3415
Web: http://www.sota.com


ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Steve Thomas
    13 years ago
    Aug 12, 1999

    I just got my May issue of your magazine and had to laugh when I read the NT News Network story, “Windows NT 5.0 Will Be a 1998 Product.” Isn’t Microsoft repeating with NT what it just got away from with Exchange 5.0? Exchange 4.0 was available in different flavors and had add-on modules for things such as the Internet Mail Connector and the cc:Mail Connector. When Microsoft released 5.0, it included, at no extra cost, the modules that we previously ordered and paid for separately. I’m sure Microsoft had reasons for abandoning the separate packaging with Exchange server, but evidently the company didn’t tell its NT Server team why.

    --Steve Thomas,

    U.S. Navy

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here